Should supplementation be considered?
James Fleck: Anticancerweb 06(12), 2020
Vitamin D is actually a precursor to a potent steroid hormone called calcitriol, which regulates several cellular pathways, eventually related to cancer risk. Under exposure to sunlight, ultraviolet radiation penetrates the skin and leads to photolysis of pro-vitamin D3 into pre-vitamin D3. Sequentially, pre-vitamin D3 will be isomerized into vitamin D3. Once formed, vitamin D3 enters the circulation being metabolized in the liver and the kidney to 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1,25 di-hydroxyvitamin D3. The last is also called calcitriol, which is the biological active form of vitamin D. Some epidemiological studies have suggested a lower cancer mortality rate in geographic areas with greater exposure to sunlight and meta-analyzes of prospective randomized trials have also shown a potential reduction in cancer mortality rate with vitamin D supplementation. However, the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force is still concerned about the specific benefit of vitamin D3 supplementation in preventing cancer.
A group of doctors from the Division of Endocrinology - Stanford University School of Medicine published in Nature Reviews a comprehensive assessment of the genomic mechanism for the action of calcitriol and its proposed antineoplastic function. Dietary vitamin D3 is converted to 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in the liver. This is the circulating form of vitamin D, which is subsequently hydroxylated to 1,25 di-hydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol) by the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP27B1 located in the kidney. Calcitriol is also synthesized locally by the same enzyme CYP27B1, which is found in most extra-renal tissues, including cancer cells, further contributing to autocrine and paracrine regulation. Regardless being synthesized in the kidney or in the target cell, the biological action of calcitriol is mediated by the vitamin D receptor (VDR). When calcitriol binds to VDR, it generates a heterodimerization with the retinoid X receptor (RXR), followed by the complex (ligand-VDR-RXR) translocation to the nucleus. The complex binds to vitamin D response elements (VDRE), which leads to positive and negative transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Consequently, some target genes are responsible for a wide range of calcitriol-mediated anticancer action, including proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, inflammation, angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis.
Genomic mechanism for the action of calcitriol in its proposed antineoplastic function
Abbreviation of biological markers: VDR = Vitamin D Receptor, RXR = Retinoid X Receptor, Increase in p21 and p27 expression, decrease in CDKs (Cyclin-dependent Kinase), Cyclins, Myc and RB, increase in BAX, decrease in BCL2, inhibition of COX2 (cyclooxygenase-2) and PGL (prostaglandin), decrease in VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor), IL-8 (interleukin-8) and PGE2 (Prostaglandin-E2), decrease expression of MMP9 (Matrix Metalloproteinase-9), PA (Plasminogen Activator), TIMP1 (Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1)
In January 2019 the New England Journal of Medicine publish the results of the Vital Trial conducted by the Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard School of Medicine. A total of 25871 participants were randomized, including 5106 (20%) African Americans, since pigmentation reduces skin synthesis of vitamin D. It was a prospective randomized, placebo-controlled trial, with a 2 x 2 factorial design where intervention groups were treated with vitamin D3 2000 IU per day and marine n-3 (omega-3) fatty acids at a dose of 1 g per day. Eligibility criteria include men ≥ 50 years-old and women ≥ 55 years-old. Study design is represented below:
The primary end-points were the diagnosis of any type of invasive cancer and major cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke or death from cardiovascular causes). The median follow-up was 5.3 years and cancer was diagnosed in 793 participants in the vitamin D group and 824 participants in the placebo group (HR = 0.96, P = 0.47). Death from invasive cancer was considered a secondary endpoint and was observed in 154 participants in the vitamin D group and 187 participants in the placebo group (HR = 0.83). In conclusion, the cumulative incidence of any type of invasive cancer or death from cancer did not significantly differ between the two main groups (vitamin D x placebo). However, in a post-hoc analysis, some tests for proportionality over time were significant for the rate of death from cancer. Analysis excluding 1-year of follow-up and 2-year follow-up (not specified in the protocol) led to a lower rate of death from invasive cancer in the vitamin D group than in placebo group (respectively, HR = 0.79 and HR = 0.75). Subgroup analyses also raised the possibility of differential effects on cancer incidence according the body mass index (BMI), since normal-weight participants receiving vitamin D had a lower cancer incidence than those receiving placebo. Despite an interesting rational for antineoplastic action of vitamin D, the effects may be restricted to specific subgroups which would be better identified in a near future.
1. Feldman D, Krishnan AV, Swami S, et al: The role of vitamin D in reducing cancer risk and progression. Nat Rev Cancer 14: 342-57, 2014
2. Manson JE, Cook NR, Lee I-M, et al: Vitamin D Supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease, N Engl J Med 380: 33-44, 2019
3. Photo by Andres Siimon on Unsplash